Why don't I like the idea of domination?
===English version follow===
Un jour, un hamster m'a écrit pour me demander : "I'm seeking good, honest, truthful, obedient and understanding submissive Sissyslut to own . Are you willing to give up all free will? " ... give up all free will ? Je lui ai répondu que "As someone who does not believe in free will and who believes in determinism, I would tell you that a person's actions are determined by prior causes and that this person has no choice in their actions. This person could also say that domination is an illusion, because he himself is determined by prior causes and has no choice in his actions. Ultimately, this person might say that domination is a social construct that does not reflect the reality of human nature."
C'était sans doute la chose la moins érotique que j'ai du écrire a quelqu'un, mais c'étais les mots "Free will" qui m'ont totalement déenchanté.
Beaucoup de gens pense que s'ils ont réussi, c'est par leur seul volonté ! Ça voudrait dire que les personnes qui ont sombré dans un destin funest n'ont simplement pas voulu survivre ou avancé dans un cheminement de vie les écartant de la souffrance? Ca me semble un peu insensible. Je pense a toute les personne LGBTQIA+ qui on dit a leur parent ou ami qui iel se sentait être et qui on été rejeté, chassé, battue, exclue et abandonner, si ce n'est pas tenté d'être tué dans certain endroit de notre monde.
Je ne crois pas qu'il y a réellement un libre arbitre. On est tous conditionné a agir selon ce qu'on pense être la meilleur facon d'être, même si ca ne marche pas. Et on oublie trop souvent qu'au grand JDR de la vie. Quand on crée nos personnages, on roule plus des dés que l'on place des points de façon équitable. On a de façon erroné mais naturel je pense, l'idée que notre vie est une "norme" et que la majorité des gens vive comme nous. On ignore que tous (au sain d'une même région) ne naissent pas dans les même condition, n'ont pas le même base parentale, n'ont pas les même gène, ne souffre pas des même maladie, n'ont pas les même ressources financière, la même éducation (et même au sein d'une même école où un prof pourrait négliger et avantager des élevés pour des motifs arbitraire) et donc n'ont pas les même chance dans la vie. J'utilise le mot chance pour parler d'élément non contrôlable (et non pas d'une quelle contre déité qui aurais la capacité de nous départir de sa simple volonté entre miséreux et riche.
Qu'en pensez vous?
P.S. J'adore qu'on restrain mes mouvement, mais pas qu'on m'enleve quelquechose qui n'existe pas ;)
======
One day, a hamster wrote to me asking: "I'm seeking good, honest, truthful, obedient and understanding submissive Sissyslut to own. Are you willing to give up all free will? " ... give up all free will ? I replied that "As someone who does not believe in free will and who believes in determinism, I would tell you that a person's actions are determined by prior causes and that this person has no choice in their actions. This person could also say that domination is an illusion, because he himself is determined by prior causes and has no choice in his actions. Ultimately, this person might say that domination is a social construct that does not reflect the reality of human nature."
It was probably the least erotic thing I've ever written to someone, but it was the words "Free will" that completely turned me off.
Many people think that if they succeeded, it was through their will alone! Would that mean that the people who fell into a disastrous fate simply did not want to survive or advance in a life path that kept them away from suffering? It seems a little insensitive to me. I think of all the LGBTQIA+ people who were told to their parent or friend who they felt they were and who were rejected, chased away, beaten, excluded and abandoned, if not tempted to be killed in a certain place in our country. world.
I don't believe there really is free will. We are all conditioned to act according to what we think is the best way to be, even if it doesn't work. And we too often forget that the great RPG of life. When we create our characters, we roll dice more than we place points fairly. We have, in an erroneous but natural way I think, the idea that our life is a "norm" and that the majority of people live like us. We do not know that not everyone (within the same region) is born in the same condition, does not have the same parental basis, does not have the same genes, does not suffer from the same illness, does not have the same same financial resources, the same education (and even within the same school where a teacher could neglect and favor students for arbitrary reasons) and therefore do not have the same chances in life. I use the word luck to speak of an uncontrollable element (and not of someone against a deity who would have the capacity to separate us from his simple will between the poor and the rich.
What do you think?
P.S. I love having my movements restricted, but not having something taken away from me that doesn't exist ;)
Un jour, un hamster m'a écrit pour me demander : "I'm seeking good, honest, truthful, obedient and understanding submissive Sissyslut to own . Are you willing to give up all free will? " ... give up all free will ? Je lui ai répondu que "As someone who does not believe in free will and who believes in determinism, I would tell you that a person's actions are determined by prior causes and that this person has no choice in their actions. This person could also say that domination is an illusion, because he himself is determined by prior causes and has no choice in his actions. Ultimately, this person might say that domination is a social construct that does not reflect the reality of human nature."
C'était sans doute la chose la moins érotique que j'ai du écrire a quelqu'un, mais c'étais les mots "Free will" qui m'ont totalement déenchanté.
Beaucoup de gens pense que s'ils ont réussi, c'est par leur seul volonté ! Ça voudrait dire que les personnes qui ont sombré dans un destin funest n'ont simplement pas voulu survivre ou avancé dans un cheminement de vie les écartant de la souffrance? Ca me semble un peu insensible. Je pense a toute les personne LGBTQIA+ qui on dit a leur parent ou ami qui iel se sentait être et qui on été rejeté, chassé, battue, exclue et abandonner, si ce n'est pas tenté d'être tué dans certain endroit de notre monde.
Je ne crois pas qu'il y a réellement un libre arbitre. On est tous conditionné a agir selon ce qu'on pense être la meilleur facon d'être, même si ca ne marche pas. Et on oublie trop souvent qu'au grand JDR de la vie. Quand on crée nos personnages, on roule plus des dés que l'on place des points de façon équitable. On a de façon erroné mais naturel je pense, l'idée que notre vie est une "norme" et que la majorité des gens vive comme nous. On ignore que tous (au sain d'une même région) ne naissent pas dans les même condition, n'ont pas le même base parentale, n'ont pas les même gène, ne souffre pas des même maladie, n'ont pas les même ressources financière, la même éducation (et même au sein d'une même école où un prof pourrait négliger et avantager des élevés pour des motifs arbitraire) et donc n'ont pas les même chance dans la vie. J'utilise le mot chance pour parler d'élément non contrôlable (et non pas d'une quelle contre déité qui aurais la capacité de nous départir de sa simple volonté entre miséreux et riche.
Qu'en pensez vous?
P.S. J'adore qu'on restrain mes mouvement, mais pas qu'on m'enleve quelquechose qui n'existe pas ;)
======
One day, a hamster wrote to me asking: "I'm seeking good, honest, truthful, obedient and understanding submissive Sissyslut to own. Are you willing to give up all free will? " ... give up all free will ? I replied that "As someone who does not believe in free will and who believes in determinism, I would tell you that a person's actions are determined by prior causes and that this person has no choice in their actions. This person could also say that domination is an illusion, because he himself is determined by prior causes and has no choice in his actions. Ultimately, this person might say that domination is a social construct that does not reflect the reality of human nature."
It was probably the least erotic thing I've ever written to someone, but it was the words "Free will" that completely turned me off.
Many people think that if they succeeded, it was through their will alone! Would that mean that the people who fell into a disastrous fate simply did not want to survive or advance in a life path that kept them away from suffering? It seems a little insensitive to me. I think of all the LGBTQIA+ people who were told to their parent or friend who they felt they were and who were rejected, chased away, beaten, excluded and abandoned, if not tempted to be killed in a certain place in our country. world.
I don't believe there really is free will. We are all conditioned to act according to what we think is the best way to be, even if it doesn't work. And we too often forget that the great RPG of life. When we create our characters, we roll dice more than we place points fairly. We have, in an erroneous but natural way I think, the idea that our life is a "norm" and that the majority of people live like us. We do not know that not everyone (within the same region) is born in the same condition, does not have the same parental basis, does not have the same genes, does not suffer from the same illness, does not have the same same financial resources, the same education (and even within the same school where a teacher could neglect and favor students for arbitrary reasons) and therefore do not have the same chances in life. I use the word luck to speak of an uncontrollable element (and not of someone against a deity who would have the capacity to separate us from his simple will between the poor and the rich.
What do you think?
P.S. I love having my movements restricted, but not having something taken away from me that doesn't exist ;)
4 months ago